-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
Hmmm...what did they use to destroy the Enterprise in the time-loop episode? What was the USS Odyssey made from when it blew up? Discounting a BOBW or USS Yamato origin, the nacelles could have been from either of those explosions...
-------------------- Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering. -Aeschylus, Agamemnon
Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
posted
Could it be from the Niagara class, the ship that was positioned vertically when the E-D flew by? It always looked like the ship's nacelle were not connected to the body in that scene.
Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by Dukhat: There's actually one object that might be a nacelle. It's long and thin, and can be seen during the scene right before the commercial break.
Right, that could be a warp nacelle. But it also could be something else. Honestly I don't know...
Registered: Oct 2002
| IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by Mars Needs Women: Could it be from the Niagara class, the ship that was positioned vertically when the E-D flew by? It always looked like the ship's nacelle were not connected to the body in that scene.
The middle warp nacelle of the USS Princeton is damaged, and the picture of those two nacelles did not reflect this. Besides this, there is a back stage picture of the USS Princeton model, that clearly shows that the warp nacelles are a) connected to the ship and b) not galaxy-style.
Registered: Oct 2002
| IP: Logged
posted
Wait, waht? The USS Princeton had galaxy class nacelles- they were cast from the 4 footer's nacelles, IIRC.
-------------------- Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering. -Aeschylus, Agamemnon
Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
posted
Correct. The pylons are not Galaxy-style, but the nacelles most certainly are.
-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
Printer-friendly view of this topic
