Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Once More Unto The (Warp Core) Breach, Dear Friends... (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   
Author Topic: Once More Unto The (Warp Core) Breach, Dear Friends...
Starbuck
"Replicate some marmalade, Commander - helm control is toast!"
Member # 153

 - posted      Profile for Starbuck     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
If you survived my last three posts, check this one out:

Why does a warp core breach destroy the whole ship? If the antimatter is released, it will only interact with matter of the same type - at least, that's what a physicist friend of mine says.
Is the catastrophic explosion due to the uncontrolled matter/antimatter reaction?

------------------
WARNING: Storing semtex in the microwave
may be hazardous to your health!


Registered: Jun 1999  |  IP: Logged
Michael Dracon
aka: NightWing or Altair
Member # 4

 - posted      Profile for Michael Dracon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Matter and antimatter do not need to be of the same type to anniliate eachother.

------------------
"Scan that ship Mr. Worf!"
"Aye sir, 600 DPI?"


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
The First One
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed
Member # 35

 - posted      Profile for The First One         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Think "massive release of energy as matter and antimatter annihlate each other."
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Bernd
Guy from Old Europe
Member # 6

 - posted      Profile for Bernd     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Not the whole ship is annihilated, but those on the ship wouldn't possibly care if they are annihilated or just blown to dust. Think of E=mc^2, meaning that 100kg of matter/antimatter are converted 9*10^18J of energy.

------------------
"When diplomacy fails, there's only one alternative - violence. Force must be applied without apology. It's the Starfleet way."
A somewhat different Janeway in VOY: "Living Witness"
Ex Astris Scientia


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Michael Dracon
aka: NightWing or Altair
Member # 4

 - posted      Profile for Michael Dracon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
And can you tell me what 9*10^18J of energy is capable of doing to a ship?

------------------
"Scan that ship Mr. Worf!"
"Aye sir, 600 DPI?"


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Baloo
Curmudgeon-in-Chief
Member # 5

 - posted      Profile for Baloo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Think of it this way:

I read long ago that the total amount of matter that was converted into energy by the Hiroshima bomb was (not more than) approximately 5 grams.

100kg of matter combining with 100 kg of antimatter equals about 40,000 of those bombs. That's quite a bit of boom.

--Baloo

------------------
It is less important that you agree with me than it is for you to to understand what I'm saying.

http://members.tripod.com/~Bob_Baloo/index.htm


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
The First One
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed
Member # 35

 - posted      Profile for The First One         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes. So really warp core breaches should be even more violent than they appear. Especially when all it took was a volley of Romulan torpedoes to open up the subspace rift that the E-C went through. . .
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Davok
Member
Member # 143

 - posted      Profile for Davok     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The TNG TM states that a photon torpedo carries 1.5 kg of antimatter. So wouldn't that be 300 Hiroshima bombs then?
I mean one Klingon torpedo in TSFS for example should have been more than enough to totally blow up the 1701 rather than just to blast a tiny whole into the saucer.

------------------
"Take it from me: it's a lot more fun asking questions than answering them." (Garak)

USS Allegiance NCC-74813
http://davok.cjb.net


Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged
Nim
The Aardvark asked for a dagger
Member # 205

 - posted      Profile for Nim     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You are sincerely nosy, ain'tcha, Starbuck? Writing a book, are we?? Hmmmm? Excpect a visit from the Obsidian Order!!

No, seriosly, it's good to hear all these questions again. Keeps ye'olde Trekker-scholars here busy!!! And you always learn something new!

------------------
-You're crazy!!!
-I thought I was pisces!


Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged
Masao
doesn't like you either
Member # 232

 - posted      Profile for Masao     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Of course, combat in Star Trek is completely unrealistic:
1. As was mentioned, detonations of photon torpedoes should be massive: 300 Hiroshima bombs (at around 14,000 tons of TNT each) would be equivalent to 5.2 million tons of TNT, which would be enough to destroy everything within a fairly wide radius. Explosions on screen look like a few gallons of gasoline. Also explosions should not billow in a vacuum. The gases would just keep expanding outward.
2. Unfortunately, ships seem to be firing at each other from only a few hundred meters or less. Even modern fighter planes and naval ships often fight at ranges of 10s or 100s of kilometers.
3. You can't fly through an exploding ship and expect to come out undamaged. Ship parts are not immediately converted to a vacuum.
4. I don't need to mention (but I will) that ships travelling at a high fraction of the speed of light cannot bank and turn like fighter planes and that you don't need to fight in only two dimensions.

I'm sure I'm not the first person to mention this kind of stuff, but it's always bothered me. Sorry for ranting.

------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum



Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You know, I had an interesting idea regarding why ship explosions seem to be less powerful then they should be. I'll have to give it a bit more thought first, though.

------------------
"And if we weren't good to you, Dave, you shouldn't take it all the way to your grave."
--
Will Rigby


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Davok
Member
Member # 143

 - posted      Profile for Davok     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Approved.

------------------
"Take it from me: it's a lot more fun asking questions than answering them." (Garak)

USS Allegiance NCC-74813
http://davok.cjb.net


Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged
bear
Active Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for bear     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I still think the reason for lack of damage is because we continue to underestimate the significance of structual integraty fields.

------------------
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/9268/index.html


Registered: Apr 1999  |  IP: Logged
Dax
Paradox
Member # 191

 - posted      Profile for Dax     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
There's bound to be some good reason. Starships are obviously incredibly highly advanced (beyond our current comprehension, anyway).

------------------
"Forgive me if I don't share your euphoria!" (Weyoun to Dukat, Tears of the Prophets)
Dax's Ships of STAR TREK


Registered: Jul 1999  |  IP: Logged
Jaresh Inyo
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'd always imagined that photon torpedoes sort of implode, delivering an incredible amount of damage to a relatively small surface area. I mentioned in one of my stories that a photon torpedo can be set to explode over ground targets, causing similar damage that a nuclear warhead would, over a similar area. When you think about it, an exploding torpedo would be very inefficient, since only a fraction of the explosive force would be absorbed by the target. An imploding torpedo makes more sense.

------------------
"I promise you, Wilma, that not one man on this force will rest until the criminal scum that did this are behind bars. Now let's go get a bite to eat." - Frank Drebbin, Detective Lieutenant in Police Squad


IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3