Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Sci-Fi » Designs, Artwork, & Creativity » Connie competitor (Page 3)

  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   
Author Topic: Connie competitor
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Rain Robinson in "Future's End" insists that the Soviet Union was indeed dismantled by 1996, probably pretty much in the same manner it happened in the real timeline. And there's no good reason to assume Robinson's timeline wasn't the main Trek one in that respect.

There's nothing to say it wasn't founded again, though, to survive all the way to the mid-24th century and the Tsiolkovski dedication plaque. "Survival" being defined by the same terms as the "survival" of France, of course, given the birth of a world government in the 22nd century.

Timo Saloniemi

Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Masao
doesn't like you either
Member # 232

 - posted      Profile for Masao     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
One difference between the Trek timeline and ours is that Trek-verse exists in a world without the Star Trek TV show. This means all of us would suddenly vanish from existence (worst-case scenario) or be posting on a Lost in Space forum (pretty bad as well).

--------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum

Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
So, what would a Jupiter I look like? [Smile]

Timo Saloniemi

Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Wraith
Zen Riot Activist
Member # 779

 - posted      Profile for Wraith     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Perhaps the USSR was resurrected after WWIII. Or possibly the place names were just changed back to the Soviet ones; strange as it may seem there is a lot of nostalgia, in Russia at least, for the days of the USSR and a lot of respect for Lemin, Stalin et al. I imagine at least some, if not most of this, is due to Soviet conditioning though.

On naming starships for Soviets: I doubt it'd be appropriate to name them for Stalin and the other unsavoury types, but military leaders (We've seen the USS Zhukov, after all), should be OK, as should scientists. I'm sure there are plenty from the Tsarist period as well; possibly also members of the Provisional Government, such as Lvov and maybe even the less radical socialists of the period, Mensheviks and so on.

--------------------
"I am an almost extinct breed, an old-fashioned gentleman, which means I can be a cast-iron son-of-a-bitch when it suits me." --Jubal Harshaw

Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Masao
doesn't like you either
Member # 232

 - posted      Profile for Masao     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Final version (I hope)!: http://lobotomy.pleh.net/~flareupload/uploads/232/PyotrVelikiyR.jpg

I applied all the graphics, made the nacelles the same height on all the views, and added a fantail and shuttlebay to the engineering hull.

--------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum

Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Shik
Starship database: completed; History of Starfleet: done; website: probably never
Member # 343

 - posted      Profile for Shik     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Bloody marvelous.

I take it that with the assigned hull number, you're saying "eff the Okudists" & sticking with sequential CNS numbers?

--------------------
"The French have a saying: 'mise en place'—keep everything in its fucking place!"

Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I concur, this looks incredible. But then, I already said that via e-mail. [Wink]

As for the "Eff the Okudists" attitude... my personal belief is that Matt Decker's Constellation is actually NCC-1710, but was strangely transposed on the camera due to the intense gravitational and energy fields emitted by the Doomsday Machine.

...Either that, or one of the strange effects of the planet killer's anti-proton beam was to lift the paint markings off the hull and put them back in different positions. [Wink]

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Just to open a big can of worms:
The numbering system probably was sequential in tOS when there was only one large Starfleet shipyard and became non-sequential once additional shipyards were built and bega making ships without realtime communication with the other yards.
It explains the two Yeagers too!


....and the Defiant is 179 meters long! [Big Grin]

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Shik
Starship database: completed; History of Starfleet: done; website: probably never
Member # 343

 - posted      Profile for Shik     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Let's not go down this road. I only asked because I was curious as to whether it was a placeholder or not. It's his universe & I don't care.

--------------------
"The French have a saying: 'mise en place'—keep everything in its fucking place!"

Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
Masao
doesn't like you either
Member # 232

 - posted      Profile for Masao     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm going to say that Connies are all numbered sequentially from 1700. The 1600s and 1800s on the SB 11 chart are ships of other classes. I agree with Minutiae on Constellation's registry. That makes the most sense to me.

--------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum

Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Wraith
Zen Riot Activist
Member # 779

 - posted      Profile for Wraith     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Excellant, as always Masao!

As for the Constellation, the registry was just painted on wrong during her last overhaul and there wasn't enough time to fix it. [Wink]

--------------------
"I am an almost extinct breed, an old-fashioned gentleman, which means I can be a cast-iron son-of-a-bitch when it suits me." --Jubal Harshaw

Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Masao
doesn't like you either
Member # 232

 - posted      Profile for Masao     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I fixed a problem with the nacelles and supports on the top view. That's all: http://lobotomy.pleh.net/~flareupload/uploads/232/PyotrVelikiy1a.jpg

--------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum

Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3