posted
Yes, ok, I'm more or less convinced there is a third impulse engine. So I'll model one, and change the pods to grey at the back.
But hey! I didn't miss everything. There is one fairly significant error with this N.O. Not my fault, just of lack of info from old reference pics. No-one here has spotted it yet though...
-------------------- "To the Enterprise and the Stargazer. Old girlfriends we'll never meet again." - Scotty
posted
Would that be the lack of a secondary hull ventral undercut, the absence of shuttlebays 2 & 3 on the neck (which would be just cargo bays at this scale), or that your mesh doesn't reflect the fact that the 10-Forward windows seam to have become the backup deflector while the Galaxy's backup is just a group of windows on the Kyushu?
I could also point out that there should be an apparent separation plate even though the ship probably doesn't separate, that the window and escape pod hatch patterns aren't quite right, that the bridge module is a custom job and is not identical to the Galaxy's, that there are supposed to be phaser arrays on the pylons and that there should be a pair of transport emitters on the underside of the saucer, flanking the forward tip of the neck (plus one more under each of the saucer's impulse engines, one on each pylon and a pair flanking the lowermost pod)....but that would be nitpicking
Lol, but no, you still haven't identified it. It's simply the fact that on the Kyushu photos you can see that the back of the saucer runs smooth and flush into the neck. My N.O saucer is continuous at the back, and the neck is separate. Not that I knew this when I modelled it...
-------------------- "To the Enterprise and the Stargazer. Old girlfriends we'll never meet again." - Scotty
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Mad]](mad.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic
