posted
You shut up, Veers! What I'm saying is just because someone wins an award, doesn't mean they are experienced. Second, I was saying critics are stupid as a joke. Why are you jumping on me anyway you of all people. You had a tantrum when I said I didn't enjoy JPIII as much as I did POTA, up untill the ending that is.
I didn't say he wasn't deserving, what I was saying was, listen closely, just because you win an award doesn't mean your the best director and screenwriter in the universe. Experienced, from what you said one script doesn't justify experienced.
-------------------- President Josiah Bartlet: Congratulations. So, who is da man on this one?
Communications Director Toby Ziegler: I think this time we're all collectively da man, sir.
Deputy Communications Director Sam Seaborn: I accidentally slept with a call girl.
Communications Director Toby Ziegler: Accidentally? Did you trip over something? ----------------- The West Wing
posted
A tantrum? When did I have this? I objected to it, but I respected your opinion at least. And I think Ebert is deserving of the award, but I can say that not all awards are given to the deserving person. For instance, "Gladiator." "Traffic," or "Crouching Tiger," or maybe (wince) Chocolat were more deserving films to win Best Picture at the Oscars. Since yuo said the critics thing all the time, I never thought it was a joke. I now apologize for that misconception.
Printer-friendly view of this topic
