Near Earth Object Information Centre National Space Centre, Exploration Drive, Leicester Press Release, Thursday 20th June 2002: Asteroid 2002MN
For immediate release
Asteroid 2002MN gives Earth its closest shave in years
On Friday 14 June, an asteroid the size of a football pitch made one of the closest ever recorded approaches to Earth. Astronomers working on the LINEAR search programme, near Socorro, New Mexico first detected the giant rock on 17 June, a few days after its close approach.
The Near Earth Object, known to astronomers as '2002MN', was travelling at over 10 km/s (23,000 miles per hour) when it passed Earth at a distance of around 120,000 km (75,000 miles), bringing it well inside the Moon's orbit. The last time a known asteroid passed this close was back in December 1994.
Asteroids are typically too small and distant to measure their size directly from Earth, so scientists use the amount of light they reflect, along with a basic understanding of the materials they are made of, to estimate their size. With a diameter between 50-120 metres, 2002 MN is a lightweight among asteroids and incapable of causing damage on a global scale, such as the object associated with the extinction of the dinosaurs.
However, if it had hit the Earth, 2002MN may have caused local devastation similar to that which occurred in Tunguska, Siberia in 1908, when 2000 square kilometres of forest were flattened. Whilst the vast majority of NEOs discovered do not come this close, such near misses do highlight the importance of detecting these objects. This reminder comes in a week when the UK telescopes on La Palma are being tested to search for NEOs.
Brief Description of Object Object Designation: 2002MN Date of First Observation: 17/06/02 Number of Observations: 14 Search Team: LINEAR (Lincoln Near Earth Asteroid Research) Date of Closest Approach: 14/06/02 Closest Approach Distance: 0.000797 AU or 119,229 km (0.3 Lunar Distances) Asteroids Velocity Relative to Earth at Closest Approach: 10.58 km/s (23,667 miles per hour) Estimated Diameter of Asteroid: 50-120 metres Orbital Period: 894.9 days
For further information contact: Kevin Yates (Project Officer) Near Earth Object Information Centre. +44(0)116 2582130 or 07740 896141; email: [email protected]
-------------------- "Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)
posted
Armageddon was an awful movie, true, but I don't think a complete lack of acting talent was the problem. After all, many of its cast is consistently good to great in non-Bay productions.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
EdipisReks
Ex-Member
posted
the problems with "Armageddon" are the same problems that "Reign of Fire" most likely will have (well, probably already has, but the movie isn't out yet so i can ony speculate): script writers who had just graduated from first grade when they got the job and people with money but no higher brain functions.
quote:Astronomers working on the LINEAR search programme, near Socorro, New Mexico first detected the giant rock on 17 June, a few days after its close approach.
A few days after !?! What the hell is the point of that? "It has just been announced that the state of montana was completely devestated by an asteroid impact three days ago..."
-------------------- "I am an almost extinct breed, an old-fashioned gentleman, which means I can be a cast-iron son-of-a-bitch when it suits me." --Jubal Harshaw
Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged
EdipisReks
Ex-Member
posted
i'm sure that an actual asteroid hit would have been easier to notice.
IP: Logged
posted
Armaggedon had good special effects...which is about the only good thing I can say about it, save the scene where Bruce Willis is reading the crew's demands. "You guys can't tell us who killed Kennedy, can you?"
quote:A few days after !?! What the hell is the point of that?
The point is "If we had more search resources, we'd have a much better chance of spotting these things before it's too late, so raise the budget!"
[ June 22, 2002, 08:23: Message edited by: First of Two ]
-------------------- "The best defense is not a good offense. The best defense is a terrifyingly accurate and devastatingly powerful offense, with multiply-overlapping kill zones and time-on-target artillery strikes." -- Laurence, Archangel of the Sword
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
I really like Armageddon...in fact, it's probably one of my favorite movies, mostly because it didn't really try to be very serious. I appreciate it as a comedy, which might even be what the creators intended.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
I actually thought Armageddon was a pretty good action film. Mind you, anyone who went in expecting the film version of "War and Peace" is smoking really good crack. Especially compared to "Deep Impact", Armageddon is a work of art.
Compared to recent films like Insomnia, or Memento, Armageddon doesn't stand up. Compared to older films, it doesn't stand up. It'll never be on the quality level of a lot of films.
But as far as fun science fiction films goes, it was pretty damn good, damn fun and worth the cost of the ticket.