posted
I have no problem with the law having a minimum age for sexual intercourse (straight and gay). If you have to be a certain age to drive, drink, and shoot your neighbours with a gun, then you should have to be a certain age before you can do the sex thing.
As for deviant, hmm. If by deviant, you include stuff that makes me say "In god's name why?", I'd probably include felching. In fact, the whole rear hole area doesn't appeal to me, not when the front one is so much nicer (well, not nicer to look at, perhaps. And smell-wise, it's pretty even, but it does have easier access, and is slightly less painful for both parties. I've never been a fan of people who come in the back door).
What are we talking about again?
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256
posted
You tell me.
-------------------- ".mirrorS arE morE fuN thaN televisioN" - TEH PNIK FLAMIGNO
Registered: Nov 1999
| IP: Logged
-------------------- "The best defense is not a good offense. The best defense is a terrifyingly accurate and devastatingly powerful offense, with multiply-overlapping kill zones and time-on-target artillery strikes." -- Laurence, Archangel of the Sword
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
About the age thing, the gay thing, the felching thing, or the anal option?
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
I've got no problem with anything my partner (partner? when the fuck did that become an acceptable way of talking about a girlfiend/boyfriend? did I miss something? a partner is somebody you start a buisness with, or somebody you fight crime with) wants to do. Unless somebody gets hurt.
Namely me. She's into wierd, unnamed sexual practices, where she gives--and likes to receive-- oral pleasure. it's deviant, but, lock me up, damnit, because it ain't stopping.
In all seriousness, why did these laws become laws in the first place? Or, Now that we're not hallucinating on a daily basis like some of the earlier generations apparently were, why haven't we overturned them, called them invalid? The fact that they're still on the books bothers me.
[ February 02, 2002, 00:08: Message edited by: thoughtcriminal84 ]
Registered: Jan 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
What part of "totally" didn't you get, Liam?
There's nothing twisted about oral. There's nothing twisted about dual-partners, either.
Because _I_ can't be twisted. No.
"Why are you making me know this?" -- cdck
-------------------- "The best defense is not a good offense. The best defense is a terrifyingly accurate and devastatingly powerful offense, with multiply-overlapping kill zones and time-on-target artillery strikes." -- Laurence, Archangel of the Sword
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
quote:In fact, the whole rear hole area doesn't appeal to me, not when the front one is so much nicer (well, not nicer to look at, perhaps. And smell-wise, it's pretty even, but it does have easier access, and is slightly less painful for both parties. I've never been a fan of people who come in the back door).
Liam said this, I agreed with it (as part of my total agreement with his entire post). How much clearer could it possibly be?
-------------------- "The best defense is not a good offense. The best defense is a terrifyingly accurate and devastatingly powerful offense, with multiply-overlapping kill zones and time-on-target artillery strikes." -- Laurence, Archangel of the Sword
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Well, the whole dual-partners thing happened around three years before I met Julie.
The rest is NOYDB.
-------------------- "The best defense is not a good offense. The best defense is a terrifyingly accurate and devastatingly powerful offense, with multiply-overlapping kill zones and time-on-target artillery strikes." -- Laurence, Archangel of the Sword
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic
