quote:Originally posted by PsyLiam: It's not that. It's just that, well, there's no reason for them to be considered canon at all. They were only originally that because Taylor said so. And she has no power now, so it becomes moot.
So, all that Trek episode produced by people no longer "in power" are non-canon as well now?
-------------------- "Do I remember about my amnesia?"
Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged
Trek episodes are automatically canon. Books aren't. The Taylor books were only canon because she was a big-wig at the time. Now she's not.
It's fairly irrelevent, since they aren't likely to have Janeway's past feature on any new episode of Trek for, well, ever, but I'm pretty sure the producers said in season 6 that they don't really pay attention to the books anymore. I doubt that most of them had even read them.
If you must, I can see them being put in the same "sort of" canon catagory as Yesteryear, but it's still a highly pointless argument.
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
So basically they are as canon as they need to be to clearify a vague episode-spoken backstory as need be, as the case with TAS and the references to both "yesteryear" and uhh.."time trap"....
-------------------- Hey, it only took 13 years for me to figure out my password...
Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged
posted
Yeah. It comes down to how much of a fan the writer of the episode is, as in the case of Ron Moore's dropping of TAS references, and the fact that Okuda and co really like "Yesteryear".
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
I never got the impression that Ro's earring really violated, in itself, any Starfleet dress code. Just that said code is, within limits, up to one's CO, and Riker obviously had issues with her he did not have with Worf. He's lucky she didn't complain to somebody higher up. Would have made a thrilling episode of Starfleet: JAG.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Besides....Roker really couldnt saw anything about Ro after he fucked her and all.
Edit: that was supposed to read "Riker".
[ December 16, 2003, 02:50 AM: Message edited by: Jason Abbadon ]
-------------------- Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering. -Aeschylus, Agamemnon
Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
posted
Wow. My usual lackluster typing skills take a drastic downturn after thriteen hours of work.
And the thought of Al Roker bedding Ro Laren both sickens and amuses me. I salute your depravity, sir!
-------------------- Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering. -Aeschylus, Agamemnon
Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
posted
At least Worf advanced to a meaningful character. In the beginning his only responsibility was to walk over and slap the Alien BadDUDE-du-jour a couple of times so that he could be knocked backward a couple hundred feet to show just how bad the alien was.
-------------------- I am the Anti-Abaddon. I build models at a scale of 2500/1
Registered: Aug 2003
| IP: Logged