Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » City of New Orleans (Page 3)

  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   
Author Topic: City of New Orleans
Harry
Stormwind City Guard
Member # 265

 - posted      Profile for Harry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
So why exactly is the station model upside down? Or are all those people stuck to the ceiling?

--------------------
Titan Fleet Yards | Memory Alpha

Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Veers
You first
Member # 661

 - posted      Profile for Veers         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
That's how they film ships and things--upside down. It's easier somehow, I don't know why.

[ January 01, 2002: Message edited by: Veers ]

--------------------
Meh

Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mark Nguyen
I'm a daddy now!
Member # 469

 - posted      Profile for Mark Nguyen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Quite simply, because the moving camera is more easily mounted ABOVE an object and shooting DOWN over something, than being under something and shooting UP. More space efficitent that way too. You'll notice that many exterior shots of main Starships (E-D, Voyager, etc.) are seen from the underside from our perspective. This filming technique, called an inferior perspective, maeks the object look bigger (as we the audience are looking "up" at it, as we would a skyscraper from outside). And as we all know, all main starships have to look big. [Smile]

Mark

--------------------
"This is my timey-wimey detector. Goes ding when there's stuff." - Doctor Who
The 404s - Improv Comedy | Mark's Starship Bridge Designs | Anime Alberta

Registered: Dec 2000  |  IP: Logged
Dukhat
Hater of Stock Footage
Member # 341

 - posted      Profile for Dukhat     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
As for the new footage, I distinctly remember that bloke saying in the interview that he went to a bit of trouble making sure that he did infact use the right names, regs & designs instead of making up some of his own.


Almost correct. Rob Legato, VFX supervisor for "Emissary" was in charge of creating the Wolf 359 battle scene, which was eventually scrapped for the newer footage we all saw. For the unused footage however, he stated that he did make sure that all the wreckage at least had the names of the ships mentioned by Shelby in BoBW, namely the Kyushu, the Melbourne, and the Tolstoy.
We now know, from both Okuda and from visual proof, that the original Nebula Melbourne and the original Kyushu were again used in this footage. The questionable ships though, are the Tolstoy and the Gage. As everyone knows, the was no original Tolstoy. Did Legato make a "new" Tolstoy for Emissary? There is no reference to the Tolstoy in the original Emissary script, however. It seems to have been replaced with the reference to a new ship, the Gage. Did Legato build this Gage ship as well? And if he did, would it's unknown design be accepted as the Apollo class ship?

--------------------
"A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop

Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3