posted
Well, we can't forget the Starfleet Scout Ship in Year 12 and the timeship Aeon in Year 10 if we're counting runabout-sized ships.
------------------ Garak: "I do apologize. You must be incensed. In fact, if I were in your shoes, I'd... grab a bottle of champagne and shoot me." (DS9: "Our Man Bashir")
Charles Capps
We appreciate your concern. It is noted and stupid.
Member # 9
posted
I was alerted to the presence of this thread by TSN... I haven't read anything, as I am attempting unsuccessfully to remain spoiler-free...
Boris: An upcoming upgrade to the UBB includes HTML page splitting. When it's released, I'll investigate porting. I'd do it myself but actually creating a working page-split routine is virtually impossible with static HTML pages, I'd need to create a dynamic generation system which would quickly cause the server to fall over.
------------------ "Okay, so I'm not "SANE" so to speak, but uh... I'm the lovable kind of psycho" http://solareclipse.net/
[This message was edited by Charles Capps on May 26, 1999.]
posted
Frank: Erm... The model that served as the Pasteur in AGT had never been used onscreen before then. They could have called it anything they wanted...
------------------ "Although I'm so tired, I'll have another cigarette. And curse Sir Walter Raleigh; he was such a stupid git." -the Beatles, "I'm So Tired"
posted
Well, during lunch I popped out tpo Waldenbooks and grabbed a looksee at the page in the TNG manual where the "Nova" is discussed.
Seems we're both not quite right.
The DESIGN LIFETIME of the Galaxy Class ships is supposed to be 100 years. This, however, does not mean that the ship would not be supplanted within a much shorter frame of time (Just as the Constitution Class saw the development of the Excelsior before its design lifetime ended, and the Excelsior saw the development of the Ambassador AND Galaxy Classes.)
The page that mentioned 20 years said that in 20 years, the Galaxy Class starships would be only 1/5 of the way into their operational lifetimes, but that eventually they would be superceded, and that designers were already working on a class incorporating the newest technologies and assumed advancements. (Of course, these assumed advances were likely made irrelevant due to the other advances coming as a result of the Borg and Dominion incursions.)
------------------ You're just JEALOUS because the little voices talk to ME!
posted
Talking about the projected lifetime of a ship v. the time in which it will be supplanted are two non related issues.
The first (total lifespan) shows the period that the ship will be in service for, and can operate effectively.
The second (superscision)is just technological replacement. As your enemies get bigger stronger ships, so will you. Thus is a period of low hostility you'll replace/upgrade at a slower rate, whilst in a period of high hostility you will develop much faster. (As First stated).
So whilst the Galaxy will have a 100 year lifespan, it would not be a top of the line ship for that period. Not even close.
IDC is right (did I just say that? *L*), this vessel is in essence a space filler. So, if we are running on Chris's principle we'd have to go chasing after every shoddly designed and shown ship from TNG onwards. And there are a hell of a lot of those.
------------------ "I have only one purpose, the destruction of Hitler.....If Hitler invaded hell I would make at least a favourbale reference to the devil in the House of Commons".
posted
Well, I just got it on good authority that it was named the Nova class. Out of the frying pan...?
------------------ "I have only one purpose, the destruction of Hitler.....If Hitler invaded hell I would make at least a favourbale reference to the devil in the House of Commons".
Topic Closed
Printer-friendly view of this topic