Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Good news about the DS9 Tech Manual ships! (Page 20)

  This topic comprises 28 pages: 1  2  3  ...  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  ...  26  27  28   
Author Topic: Good news about the DS9 Tech Manual ships!
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim:
The LUG RPG supplement Ship Recognition Manual, Volume 1: The Ships of Starfleet calls the 3-naceller the Chimera-class. That's non-canon, of course...but far closer to it (ie, officially licensed) than "Medusa."

Except for the tiny detail that there's already an established Chimera-class starship with a registry in the NCC-57xxx range... which makes that class far older than the Dominion War.

It'll be a cold day in hell before I accept the DS9 kitbashes (Centaur excepted) as deliberate and fully realized starship classes. With such graceful and meticulous designs such as the Constitution, the Excelsior, the Galaxy, the Intrepid (choose from among these as you wish), I find it hard to believe that Starfleet would stoop to build such a clunky, ugly beast in a time of non-emergency.

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Amasov Prime
lensfare-induced epileptic shock
Member # 742

 - posted      Profile for Amasov Prime     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Maybe they built them as part of a strikeforce during the cardassian war.

--------------------
"This is great. Usually it's just cardboard walls in a garage."

Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Veers
You first
Member # 661

 - posted      Profile for Veers         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have finally seen the pics. I seem to have grown attracted to these ships now. But I do have one thing to add:
What is this, Rainbow Land? [Big Grin]

--------------------
Meh

Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Shik
Starship database: completed; History of Starfleet: done; website: probably never
Member # 343

 - posted      Profile for Shik     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hahahahahahaha....

Mark, you silly bitch...how I adore you. I built that model of the Phobos for the Dominion War Contest back in 1999. I used the 1/1400-scale (well, actually 1/1375) 3-piece VGR kit. I rather liked the way that the hulls mated & the smaller raider size lent the ship a better overall size/form in my eyes. It was an inCREDibly easy bash as well.

I just built another one about 2 months ago to give to my girlfriend; that one had custom decals, but no picture of it. Yet.

[ March 14, 2002, 15:24: Message edited by: Shik ]

--------------------
"The French have a saying: 'mise en place'—keep everything in its fucking place!"

Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
Mark Nguyen
I'm a daddy now!
Member # 469

 - posted      Profile for Mark Nguyen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"Bitch"..?

Mark

--------------------
"This is my timey-wimey detector. Goes ding when there's stuff." - Doctor Who
The 404s - Improv Comedy | Mark's Starship Bridge Designs | Anime Alberta

Registered: Dec 2000  |  IP: Logged
Bernd
Guy from Old Europe
Member # 6

 - posted      Profile for Bernd     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
WOW Bernd... what program did you use to make the Centaur schem? How do you whip them up so fast!?!

Love the Centaur, but you forgot the windows in the saucer.

It's basically a re-arrangement of scanned Miranda and Centaur components. I put them together in Micrografx Picture publisher where one may operate with objects (which would be called layers in Photoshop), and I added the copper bits that I quickly sketched up myself.

BTW, the newest version has some detail corrections. I still didn't include the green saucer windows, because I think their spacing is too dense. It seems they are spread at random over possible quarters, corridors and other rooms.

--------------------
Bernd Schneider

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
There was a suggestion earlier that maybe the Elkins is just a disembodied (disenshipped?) saucer being towed by a tug (made of an F-14 and some nacelles). I liked this idea, and started to draw a diagram of the tug by itself. Unfortunately, just as I finished the top view, I noticed something: the Elkins' registry is also on the nacelles. So the tug theory doesn't work. Too bad...
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well, I've corrected my diagram of the Curry (top and side) and I have most of a side view of the Medusa. I haven't done whatever forms the back end of the Medusa since we still dont' know what it is.

Once I have a place to upload the diagrams, I'll show them off.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Well, I believe that the "Chimera" is actually drawn correctly in the DS9TM, merely because you
can see where the mounting points are for motion control, as well as the electrical wires (did
these things actually light up?), and those usually go on the bottom of a model. It could be just
like the Stargazer, where the top and bottom are nearly identical except the bridge dome is
replaced by a sensor dome.

This means nothing... models can be mounted upside down... I know the Danube/Runabout was as was DS9.

--------------------
"Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)

I'm LIZZING! - Liz Lemon (30 Rock)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Mark Nguyen
I'm a daddy now!
Member # 469

 - posted      Profile for Mark Nguyen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Most models are/can be - it makes 'em easier to be shot from below, which make them look bigger on the screen.

Mark

--------------------
"This is my timey-wimey detector. Goes ding when there's stuff." - Doctor Who
The 404s - Improv Comedy | Mark's Starship Bridge Designs | Anime Alberta

Registered: Dec 2000  |  IP: Logged
Akula
Junior Member
Member # 319

 - posted      Profile for Akula     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Now that I'm seen the pics some thoughts,
Elkins- This ship looks like some type of science vessal or possibly a transport or hospital ship. Of course the pod below it could have a totally different use.
Excelsior combo- Makes me wonder if a twin galaxy saucer ship built, sort of remides me of the stargazer.
Yeager- Does this mean that there may be a even bigger version of the maquis raider, possible the difference between swoop and corvette.
Raging Queen- I still think this is some type of carrier.
By the way do we know if there are any ships that were built for DS9 or TNG that our lying around, especially from Embissary or the other battle scenes?

Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Okay, here we go...

Corrected Curry side view.
Corrected Curry top view.
Medusa side view. It's incomplete. I'm going to see if we can find out what that crap on the rear is before I finish it. Or I'll just wing it, if necessary.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Harry
Stormwind City Guard
Member # 265

 - posted      Profile for Harry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Shouldn't the Connie pylon on the three naceller taper down to the nacelles, instead of up to the saucer?

And why have you decided to ignore the little pylon-thingies on the Curry?

--------------------
Titan Fleet Yards | Memory Alpha

Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Harry
Stormwind City Guard
Member # 265

 - posted      Profile for Harry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hey.. I was wrong on the 3-naceller. Strange, I really thought it was the other way around...

--------------------
Titan Fleet Yards | Memory Alpha

Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Amasov Prime
lensfare-induced epileptic shock
Member # 742

 - posted      Profile for Amasov Prime     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by TSN:
Okay, here we go...

Corrected Curry side view.
Corrected Curry top view.
Medusa side view. It's incomplete. I'm going to see if we can find out what that crap on the rear is before I finish it. Or I'll just wing it, if necessary.

Nice work. [Big Grin]

I see you choose the 'easy way' by drawing the saucer/sec hull connection behind the phylon. But I'd really like to know what that is that connects them. From the pictures you can only guess it's some sort of triangular thing, similar to the thing Drexler has drawn in his diagram. Could it be a part of the F-14-kit? Maybe the front end openings of the engine shafts? Or a part of the Danube cockpit?

(Hey, who's the lucky bastard who writes the 300th-anniversary-post? [Smile] )

--------------------
"This is great. Usually it's just cardboard walls in a garage."

Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 28 pages: 1  2  3  ...  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  ...  26  27  28   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3