Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Rehashing Galaxy Wings (Page 4)

  This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7   
Author Topic: Rehashing Galaxy Wings
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
*takes three drinks*
Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs
astronauts gotta get paid
Member # 239

 - posted      Profile for Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm not sure I understand this game.
Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
let [data="liking.joystick"] = [data="trying-on.TWOK-field_jacket] when assign.val [data="pathetic"] pathetic.val=[drinks.taken]1 * num.pathetic{statements.made}
Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Matrix
AMEAN McAvoy
Member # 376

 - posted      Profile for Matrix     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
For your info, the number 1,000 I picked out of my ass. However I said the capability to build 1,000 in 15 years or so years. Granted that's alot per year. But if we consider that (based on WWII demographics) UFP during the time of war, did some sort of drafting, their entire organization could be in the billions. However it's likely more of a non-drafted type, so it would be around in the tens of millions. Starfleet has the capability assuming that all starbases, space docks, or even build new ones (which shouldn't be too hard considering they are just made of some sort of mesh) within 15 years. I mean yuo first build up like 300 docks, put all Galaxy class ships in each one, maybe use some sort of mass production line for the smaller parts, assuming it takes about 5 years for each ship, Starfleet could have about 900 ships in 15 years.

I do not doubt the concept that Galaxy class ships have been destroyed. We see a very small part of some of the battles that could have happened during the war. At least one Galaxy class could have been lost in any of those unseen battles.

--------------------
Matrix
If you say so
If you want so
Then do so

Registered: Jul 2000  |  IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
i'm going to go with 'um, no'
Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
There doesn't seem to be any clear trend as to which ships blow up and which don't in a battle. The VFX guys did some nice Miranda, Akira and Excelsior deaths, but that was mainly because those three models were the most detailed. Other ship types in those size ranges were saved from destruction because they didn't look so cool!

So ship size isn't a clear survival trait. Design age isn't a clear survival trait. Heck, even having heroes aboard isn't necessarily a survival trait any more, since we did lose the Defiant once.

All we have going for the Galaxies is the hint that one of them took a hit in "TotP" and didn't explode right away, contrary to what happened to the assorted Akiras and Excelsiors with first hits. Was that just because the Galaxy was bigger and could carry bigger shield generators? Would the same advantages apply to Nebulas? Why not to Akiras (do their supposedly cavernous shuttlebays perhaps reduce their structural strength or their size/number of shield generators?)?

Timo Saloniemi

Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
PsyLiam
Hungry for you
Member # 73

 - posted      Profile for PsyLiam     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
At full phaser power, the saucer section runs out of juice for its phasers in less than 15 minutes. In normal operation, the endurance for phaser jumps to around 45 minutes. Really big difference.
Take a drink everytime someone posts information from the tech manual as cannonical fact.

quote:
The VFX guys did some nice Miranda, Akira and Excelsior deaths, but that was mainly because those three models were the most detailed.
I'm not arguing here, but isn't that also pretty much what 90% of the fleets were made up of? Pretty much the only other ships seen were Galaxies and the odd Steamrunner, correct.

For that matter, why were those ships the most detailed? During the days of TNG, it was because the Excelsior and Miranda were movie ships (and therefore high quality) but by the time of the big fleet battles of DS9 they were using CGI for the fight scenes. Did they just put more effort into the Miranda and Excelsior?

--------------------
Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Harry
Stormwind City Guard
Member # 265

 - posted      Profile for Harry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Take a drink everytime someone posts information from the tech manual as cannonical fact
Take 2 drinks everytime someone replaces 'canon' with 'cannon'. Drink your whole beverage when someone replaces 'Bussard' with 'buzzard'.

--------------------
Titan Fleet Yards | Memory Alpha

Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
PsyLiam
Hungry for you
Member # 73

 - posted      Profile for PsyLiam     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Damn you.

It's not as bad as Omega thinking I come from "Brittain" though...

--------------------
Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
David Templar
Saint of Rabid Pikachu
Member # 580

 - posted      Profile for David Templar     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Timo:
All we have going for the Galaxies is the hint that one of them took a hit in "TotP" and didn't explode right away, contrary to what happened to the assorted Akiras and Excelsiors with first hits. Was that just because the Galaxy was bigger and could carry bigger shield generators? Would the same advantages apply to Nebulas? Why not to Akiras (do their supposedly cavernous shuttlebays perhaps reduce their structural strength or their size/number of shield generators?)?

I don't even think the Nebula has as many shield generators as the Galaxy to begin with. The Nebula's a lot more compact, and doesn't have saucer separation, so she could make do with much few generators. I don't know about the Akira, she is quite a big smaller than a Galaxy. As for taking damage, I'd say the Galaxy, shielding aside, simply has more non-critical volume and mass to soak up damage. And the Galaxy in "TotP" actually took two hits. When you shoot up a Miranda, Excelsior, or Akira, you're a lot more liable to hit something important with your first shot, because of their smaller size.

--------------------
"God's in his heaven. All's right with the world."

Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Fedaykin Supastar
Member
Member # 704

 - posted      Profile for Fedaykin Supastar         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by PsyLiam:
Damn you.

It's not as bad as Omega thinking I come from "Brittain" though...

[i'm probly gonna get shot, especially after making that 'the return of kirk' theory over on the ENT board....]

at least he didnt say "brattain"

[note to BWC: this wasnt exactly funny so it isnt exactly humor]

--------------------
"Tom is Canadian. He thereby uses advanced humour tecniques, such as 'irony', 'sarcasm', and werid shit'. If you are not qualified in any of these, it will be risky for you to attempt to decipher what he means. Just smile and carry on."
- PsyLiam; 16th June

Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
TheF0rce
Active Member
Member # 533

 - posted      Profile for TheF0rce     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
A Miranda was seen taking many many hits by the owp, [this thing was getting riddled!] but it didn't blow up or at least not onscreen.
Registered: Mar 2001  |  IP: Logged
Evolved
Active Member
Member # 389

 - posted      Profile for Evolved     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
We also saw the excellent skills of the USS Hood's helmsman as the Excelsior-class ship kept up with the fast pace of the Defiant and her other Miranda escort. Despite the trend to ridicule these old classes, they should be given a lot more credit. Anyone else agree?
Registered: Jul 2000  |  IP: Logged
David Templar
Saint of Rabid Pikachu
Member # 580

 - posted      Profile for David Templar     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
^Definately. My opinion of the Excelsior is somewhat higher than the standard "cannon fodder" POV.

--------------------
"God's in his heaven. All's right with the world."

Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
J
Active Member
Member # 608

 - posted      Profile for J     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"ugly cannon fodder" perhaps

--------------------
Later, J
_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _
The Last Person to post in the late Voyager Forum. Bashing both Voyager, Enterprise, and "The Bun" in one glorious post.

[email protected]
http://webj.cjb.net

Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3