posted
I realize the TNGTM is not a novel. However, I also wouldn't consider it along the same lines as say, the Encyclopedia or the Chronology, which relate information directly from the series.
------------------ "Questions, comments, bring them to me. Problems, take them to Kinis."
posted
Frank, networks shows have never been anything but episodic, aside from those soap opera things. They're not going to start because you want things to all have a continuing plot-line.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Yes, I know what the TM is for real... and in the fictional universe... and you know what? both those things change. The directions people decide to take change. LIFE changes. There's no reason to be upset at the writers for this (hell, the writers have changed, too!)
I suppose it's a good thing the future is fluid.. time travel episodes would be a lot less fun if it wasn't.
*Looks at some of the old space shuttle designs from the tech manuals back a few decades before they built one.* Doesn't look much like the modern one, does it?
How can you hold fiction to higher standards than real life?
------------------ Calvin: "No efficiency, no accountability... I tell you, Hobbes, it's a lousy way to run a Universe." -- Bill Watterson
posted
Frank: So... Then you agree?
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Individual 5748
Ex-Member
posted
First of Two, maybe it's just me, but I'm not quite shure what you are getting at. In fact, I think we may actually be in agreement. I agree, the TM is not set in stone - that's my argument. It isn't definitive, so people should not be upset when the writers decide that it is not definitive as well.
------------------ "Questions, comments, bring them to me. Problems, take them to Kinis."
posted
Okay, apparently I'm not quite getting my point across. If the writers want to say "Well, the Nova name was taken by the TNGTM, but we want to use it, so let's say maybe the name got reassigned at some point." But what probably happened was more like:
"What should we call the ship?" "Hm... 'Nova' is a nice name..." "Y'know, it seems like that one's been used somewhere..." "Oh, who cares? Just use it hand let the <contempt=dripping>fans</contempt> figure it out if they don't like it..."
I'm not saying that this one incident is a particular problem. But it's a symptom of a larger problem, that being the fact that the people in charge really don't seem to care much about making a TV show. They just want to make money.
------------------ "Voyager is not true. If it were true, the ship would not look spick-and-span every week, after all these battles it goes through. How many times has the bridge been destroyed? How many shuttlecrafts have vanished, and another one just comes out of the oven? That kind of bullshitting the audience I think takes its toll." -Ronald D. Moore
posted
Okay, I can appreciate that. However, I have a question. This is an honest question, not a retort. Do you think that could be because VGR is tied to a network, whereas the others (namely, TNG and DS9) were not? By not being tied to a network, I bet TNG and DS9 people had the 'freedom' to take time on their work a little bit more than the VGR people do. Does that make sense?
------------------ "Questions, comments, bring them to me. Problems, take them to Kinis."
posted
I don't know anything about the television industry, so I have no idea what difference that makes.
------------------ Col. Maybourne: "Teal'c... It's good to see you well." Teal'c: "In my culture, I would be well within my rights to dismember you." -Stargate SG-1: "Touchstone"
posted
I've never been one to defend Frank, and I sure wont start now, but I'll take Babylon-5 over any of the shows Sol mentioned. I watch some X-Files, I liked NE,Twilight Zone and Twin Peaks. Never cared much for the others.
------------------ Fool of a Took, throw yourself in next time!! Gandalf
[This message has been edited by Kosh (edited January 28, 2000).]
posted
Well, so as to avoid this turning into a big shouting match, I won't go into why I think we can say that the shows I mentioned are quantifiably better. Diffrent strokes, as that tacky old show proclaimed.
------------------ "20th Century, go to sleep." -- R.E.M.
posted
*looks quizzically at Sol* "What you talkin' 'bout, Simon?" :-)
------------------ Col. Maybourne: "Teal'c... It's good to see you well." Teal'c: "In my culture, I would be well within my rights to dismember you." -Stargate SG-1: "Touchstone"
posted
Guess who's back, and with a new Xmas PC lounging around at home?
I'm the only one allowed to bash mah nahive lahnd. *gets hitting stick, walks outside and starts walloping the tarmac*
>>Diverting main power to Off-Topic Mode< I've been up since 4.20am in order to queue for a J1 visa so's I can work in the Dark Side of the Gene Pool, ie the US (Boston specifically). Anyone know what the job prospects are like for foreign students around the Northside of yer east coast? Oh, and do any websites exist that actually advertise jobs that don't require a)citizenship, and b)a two-year contract? AAAAA, as you all well know.
>>Deactivating Off-Topic Mode<<
From a few pics I saw in ST Monthly, they got the costuming terribly wrong for Kim + Paris, but two of the shop-signs I saw, 'Failte' (Welcome) and 'Buisteara' (Butchers) were right, IIRC.
Oh, and Tom: you were right back on page1 - she probably did say County Clare. Only thing is, O'Donnell is an Ulster name, and Clare is in the arse-end of the country, down in Munster.
------------------ Devil: Oh look at the time! I'm late for services. Stone: Services? Devil: A group of young teenagers that have been celebrating the Black Sabbath are planning on deep-sixing their gym teacher tonight. I'm gonna go and give them a little encouragement.
Brimstone. May it rest in syndication.
[This message has been edited by Gaseous Anomaly (edited February 01, 2000).]