Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Peregrine.....again!!! (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6   
Author Topic: Peregrine.....again!!!
bear
Active Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for bear     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ok, I am trying to make sense of the Peregrine headache, so exactly how many different ships have been described on screen as Peregrine? I am trying to put together some BS to make sense of it all, so if anybody has theory by all means share it. I apologize if this starts a heated debate.

I also would like to know if anybody has schematic of peregrine that they would let me use on my webpage. I of course will site the source with credit in the admiralty and a link to their page.

------------------
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/9268/index.html


Registered: Apr 1999  |  IP: Logged
Aethelwer
Frank G
Member # 36

 - posted      Profile for Aethelwer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
None of the ships we've seen have been referred to as Peregrines, actually; the term was only mentioned once, in "Heart of Stone" (DS9).

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"I'm still amazed at how unintuitive the Windows world is and how it tries to mimic the Mac." - John de Lancie


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Obese Penguin
Doomsayer
Member # 271

 - posted      Profile for Obese Penguin     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well the way I think of it , this is actually a huge misunderstanding between the makers of the Encyclopedia and some internet ST webmasters.

Let me take it from the Top. If you look in the St encyclopedia under Academy Trainer you will find a picture of a small fighter like craft with the Academy logo on it this is infact the Peregrine Class Fighter from "Heart of Stone" [DS9] now the real confusion came when alot of the trek websites listed the Maquis raider from "Cartaker" [VOY] as the peregrine class , anyway thats my thoery im not entirly sure.

Here's a picture of what i believe to be a Peregrine Class fighter.

This is a scan of the Academy Trainer from the ST Encyclopedia you can see the similarities.

------------------
"Marge .. Do you have other men in this House ? .. Radioactive men?"
~Homer "The Simpsons"

Jupiter Station , Starfleet Research & Development

[This message has been edited by Dhunter (edited January 16, 2000).]


Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
bonecrusher
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Your right, the Peregine is the fighter used in Sacrifice of Angels, and the What you leave behind. The encyclopedia was wrong by calling it a trainer.

The Maquis raider is the larger "fighter" or raider since it carried up to 5-7 maquis not exactly sure, in Cartaker.

Now both of these ships appeared in the episode TNG where ensign Ro goes to the maquis. THe Peregine is the ship that has the pictures above, now in this episode the Caretaker "maquis raider" was the original model, it was later changed and enlarged for the raider in Cartaker.

So here is a summary

there are 2 ships
the official Stafleet Fighter the Peregine
(ds9) Sacrifice of Angels, What you leave behind
(TNG) episode where Ro leaves Stafleet

Cartaker "maquis raider"
only seen once in Star Trek Voyager's Caretaker, then destroyed
(Voy) Caretaker
****This ship was a modified model of the other maquis ship used in the TNG episode where Ro leaves Starfleet

------------------
"I Got two words for you.. S*uck it!"-DeGeneration X
Oh Hell Ya there back!

Bonecrusher
http://members.xoom.com/smartiee


IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Er... Part of what they've said is right. But there's nothing definitive to say that that ship is the Peregrine. In "Heart of Stone", someone mentions that the Maquis are using modified Peregrine-class couriers. However, there was no ship shown on screen in reference to this name.

Some sources (at least one of Okuda, Sternabch, or Stipes, I'm not sure which) say that the fighters used in the battles scenes of the Dominion War are probably the Perries. But, like I said, nothing definitive. However, most people have accepted this idea. If this is ever fixed in the encyclopedia, or in a tech manual, it will probably say that the fighters are Peregrines.

But, then, the Peregrine could just as easily be something we've never seen before. The assignation of the name to the fighters simply stems from people's desire to match known names to known ships. Since we know the Maquis used ships like the Fed fighters, it was a logical, if unprovable, solution. Believe what you will.

------------------
"The Earl of Sandwich invented the sandwich. Samuel Morse invented the Morse Code. Plato invented the plate."
-Holly, Red Dwarf: "Parallel Universe"


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It's of interest that in "Heart of Stone", a modified Peregrine class courier is supposed to be pilotable by a single fellah. So it cannot really be the same ship flown by Chakotay in "Caretaker" and Eddington and friends in "For the Uniform", since Chakotay required a crew of at least three to fight with his ship (he could ram it into the Kazon alone, though).

Anyway, while the DS9 finale doesn't mention the name Peregrine, it at least seems to establish that the little fighter formations are called "tactical wings" (nomenclature used in many earlier episodes but never explained). As things are going badly, Sisko asks such units to escort his ship through the battle, but finds out that attrition has been too high and the formations are no longer effective. A DS9 "tactical wing" seems to be a group of something like five to ten fighters.

Timo Saloniemi


Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The thing is... that the peregrine from Heart of Stone was able to land on the planetoid... although maybe a la "Chimera" the female changeling was actually the ship...

If it was a real ship - those wings must be able to lift up... or there are landing pads.

------------------
"All the lonely people, where do they all come from" - Eleanor Rigby, The Beatles.



Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Mikey T
Driven
Member # 144

 - posted      Profile for Mikey T     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I would go with the landing pads idea. If the Danube Class, the Defiant Class, the Intrepid Class, and the various shuttles can land on planetary surfaces, I would think that the Peregrine Class could do the same.

------------------
Show me the meaning of being lonely
Is this the feeling, I need to walk in
Tell me why I can't be there where you are
There's something missing in my heart

-Backstreet Boys


Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'd suggest folding wings. If you put a seam just inboard of those wing cannon, you get a flat underside for the entire craft. It can rest on those strange corrugated pads that are used on the shuttles and runabouts - they need not extend much, just twenty centimeters to protect the nose phaser, less if the nose phaser retracts at landing.

While folding wings may not be the most practical solution out there, they nicely associate the craft with naval fighters, an association that certainly is well-founded in light of the role of these craft in the DS9 battles. Plus, it might be visually impressive. The wings would power-fold as the craft approaches ground or the shuttlebay doors; they'd come to rest against the angled surfaces of the crosswise hull beam aft of the cabin. The pads would extend slightly, and the craft would settle down with a sigh of vapors from the underside of the aft engine blocks...

Timo Saloniemi


Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well the folding wing idea would fit for the Maquis fighter... it has those streaked sections at the top of each 'wing' - like the Klingon Bird-of-prey... that would assist in folding...

The Maquis ship looks like the Federation's answer to the BOP...

------------------
"All the lonely people, where do they all come from" - Eleanor Rigby, The Beatles.



Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Nim
The Aardvark asked for a dagger
Member # 205

 - posted      Profile for Nim     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Bonecrusher, I think the raider from "Caretaker" held more like 40 people, since the entire maquis-part of Voyager's crew was on that ship.

------------------
Somehow we're going somewhere.


Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged
Aban Rune
Former ascended being
Member # 226

 - posted      Profile for Aban Rune     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
As TSN and others have said already, there is no canon evidense that either of the two ships in question is the Peregrine Class. However, the Monogram model of Chakotay's Maquis Raider has a little paragraph about the ship and says that it is a Peregrine Class ship. I know that this is hardly canon, but they had to get their info from somewhere, and I would think that it would have had to have been approved by one of TPTB.

Plus, the ship looks like a friggin' bird!!! A Peregrine is a bird...the ship looks like a bird...that always seemed to me to be an "on purpose" kind of thing.

------------------
"A gathering of Angels appeared above my head. They sang to me this song of hope, and this is what they said..." -Styx

Aban's Illustration www.thespeakeasy.com/alanfore


Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
bonecrusher
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Sorry about the Caretaker "raider" crew number i thought it was like 40, but I wasnt sure.

Anyways which ship are you talking about that could have the folding wings, the Starfleet fighters, or the Caretaker "raider"?

------------------
"I Got two words for you.. S*uck it!"-DeGeneration X
Oh Hell Ya there back!

Bonecrusher
http://members.xoom.com/smartiee


IP: Logged
Michael Dracon
aka: NightWing or Altair
Member # 4

 - posted      Profile for Michael Dracon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I prefer to go the save way, and completely ignore the word Perigrine in any designation. We've seen it used only ones, and did not get to see a ship. That's all we have...

------------------
"Reality is a condition that occurs because of a lack of alcohol."
- Albert Einstein

(-=\V/=-)


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
bonecrusher: I believe the SF fighter is the one in question (the folding wings).

------------------
"If you attempt to return the device to the store, and you are missing one single peanut, the store personnel will laugh in the chilling manner exhibited by Joseph Stalin just after he enslaved Eastern Europe."


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3