posted
So, you're one of those fellows who places one occurrence over every other onscreen and official text reference (with the exception of Mr. Scott's Guide) at a higher level of credibility.
That could easily mean it's an Enterprise-class simulator or, even more brain-numbingly obvious, the simulator in use by the Enterprise training class. Of course, I know Probert wanted the ship to be Enterprise-class, but it just didn't ever catch on...
You're clinging to dreams and fantasies, my friend.
-------------------- The flaws we find most objectionable in others are often those we recognize in ourselves.
Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
^ Sure do, and proudly so. I'm not out for blood like some people (*cough*Jamesdixon*cough*) but I don't believe everything I read in the Star Trek Encyclopedia... that's just boring IMHO. But to each their own, I guess.
Registered: May 2002
| IP: Logged
posted
Oh please, let's not get into this argument again...
It goes like this. If we follow what is onscreen, then the original Enterprise was a Starship-class. If we go by what Propert wanted, it was an Enterprise class. If we go by what everyone in charge of Star Trek has believed since 1989, then the NCC-1701 and the NCC-1701-A are Constition class, refit or no.
Jesus, it's like arguing evolution with Omega.
Back to the original topic! Yay! What was it?
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Oh, I played Harbinger (much as I don't want to admit to it), and I don't recall any ships other than the Defiant being in it.
And regarding mistakes in the list, there is one. You might want to fix the spelling of our favourite Russian Navigator/Security chief/Whatever the hell he was doing in ST VI.
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Harbinger was good, damn you. It was the first PC game I got with my new Pentium 133, and I loved it like an extrabodilial growth.
Registered: Oct 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
You thought wrong.
Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
Red BWC
Ex-Member
posted
No! He is right!!! In The Wrath of Khan a display can be seen labled as USS ENTERPRISE NCC-1701 ENTERPRISE CLASS I remember seeing it on the net someplace. (Scurries of to EAS)
IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by Red BWC: No! He is right!!! In The Wrath of Khan a display can be seen labled as USS ENTERPRISE NCC-1701 ENTERPRISE CLASS I remember seeing it on the net someplace. (Scurries of to EAS)
No, it reads MK IV SIMULATOR ENTERPRISE-CLASS
-------------------- The flaws we find most objectionable in others are often those we recognize in ourselves.
Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
Back to this again.... can't we do anything better in the off season?
-------------------- Later, J _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ The Last Person to post in the late Voyager Forum. Bashing both Voyager, Enterprise, and "The Bun" in one glorious post.
posted
Cronenburg needs to make a movie about this.
-------------------- "I was surprised by the matter-of-factness of Kafka's narration, and the subtle humor present as a result." (Sizer 2005)
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic
