Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Community » The Flameboard » How does the Bible contradict itself? (Page 4)

  This topic comprises 13 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  11  12  13   
Author Topic: How does the Bible contradict itself?
BlueElectron
Active Member
Member # 281

 - posted      Profile for BlueElectron     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
of course Spock's no bible thumper, and that's because Vulcan does not believe in religions in the first place!

------------------
What is the difference between a terriorist and your girlfriend?
- With terrorist, there is a chance of negotiation.



Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged
DT
Senior Member
Member # 80

 - posted      Profile for DT     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh, why stop with internal contradictions?

Archaelogical evidence "has wiped out the historical credibility of the conquest of Ai as reported in Joshue 7-8" - Biblical Archaeology Review, November/December 1988 p. 24

Daniel says that when Belshazzar was killed, Darius ascended the thrown. Yet, history shows us it was Cyrus the Great.

The Joshua account about the sun. How come no other record mentions this?

Deuteronomy 14:11-18 tells us bats are birds.

For more internal contradictions, how about the census in Ezra 2? Or in Nehemiah 7? As Thomas Paine once said about these verse "What certainty, then, can there be in the bible for anything?" Which is the problem with the Bible, you need PERFECT accuracy to say it is the Inspired Word of God.

Matthew 2:16 talks about Herod's order to kill all the male children in Bethlehem who were 2 and younger. Yet, no where else is this mentioned (not just in the Bible, even among ancient historians of Herod).

Pretty much all the miracles which occurred during the death of Christ are not reported ANYWHERE else in the world. A crowd of dead saints come to life and no one, not even Philo-Judaeus who lived in Jerusalem at the time, see fit to mention this? Or did god make sure they didn't mention it so that the Bible would seem more miraculous?

The New Testament itself was not cannonized until 405 CE! Books attributed to Mary Magdalene, Thomas, Paul, Andrew, Bart, Judas Iscariot, and Pilate are excluded. In the days of the early Church, many Church writers quoted these noncanonical books, yet now...?

No one even knows about the canonization of the Old Testament. Most are considered anonymous by scholars, for a reason. The Pentatauch is attributed to Moses, yet, it contains an account of his death and burial? What the hell?! Not to mention cities and regions that Moses supposedly mentions were not named until centuries after the death of Moses.

You, as a Protestant, don't accept many of the books that the Catholic Church does. The Greek Orthodox Church, for example, includes the Prayer of MAnasseh, Plasm 151 and 3 Macabees!

Mark 16:9-20 do not appear in any of the early copies of this gospel. These forged verses are the only post-resurrection appearances of Jesus in Mark.

1 John 5:7 (which I bet is in your Bible) did not appear in 1 John until the FOURTHEENTH CENTURY! It is missing from all early Greek manuscripts and from the fifth century Latin Vulgate translation.

The New Testament is in GREEK! Jesus spoke Aramaic. Thus, all his words are translated. Do you trust the translators?

We have no original documents. Most of the complete gospels we have are fourth century documents. Copies of copies.

Maybe I'd like to base my life on something other than a single book. Perhaps logic.

------------------
"A mass of tears have been transformed to stones now, sharpened on suffering and woven into slings"
Zack de la Rocha
Rage Against the Machine


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Curry Monster
Somewhere in Australia
Member # 12

 - posted      Profile for Curry Monster     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Omega-san, the bible carries a few good principles in it. But in the end it is only a scrap of paper. Like the constitution. Just words on paper. Essentially worthless. However your interpritation and actions after are what matter. You're basically saying that the bible can justify anything 'because god said so'. That makes it one very dangerous scrap of paper.

------------------
Re: Russia in WWII

"Hey, we butchered Poles! Thats OK."
- DT.


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Nim
The Aardvark asked for a dagger
Member # 205

 - posted      Profile for Nim     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Stalin and Lenin killed more souls than Hitler ever did. When was the last Gulag closed? Or are there still some left?

If Hitler had been eliminated, many other things could've gone very, very wrong. Of course, we can speculate all we want...

As for faith, I don't know where I stand. I used to believe, but in the early teens I forgot it at some point.
But I don't want to pass judgement on either side. If I've done so earlier, I'm sorry.

The bible has many good things in it, but also other things that were tailored for the times they were written.

Why Omega wants to debate every single objection people can muster against the bible is beyond me. Nothing good comes out of that. If people "tick you off", as you put it, buy a sandbag. It'd do you a lot of good.

------------------
Don't kill me, I'm charming!


Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged
Ritten
A Terrible & Sick leek
Member # 417

 - posted      Profile for Ritten     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Omega: Has something happened in the real worl that has shaken your belief system???
Or,
Being a good missionary and spreading The Word???

I am curious, since you are the (self) proclaimed debater here, why you would take up this to debate, when some of you retorts have been, 'Because God said it was okay it was moral...'.

------------------
"One's ethics are determined by what we do when no one is looking" Nugget
Star Trek: Gamma Quadrant
Star Trek: Legacy
Read them, rate them, got money, film them

"...and I remain on the far side of crazy, I remain the mortal enemy of man, no hundred dollar cure will save me..." WoV



Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
Omega
Some other beginning's end
Member # 91

 - posted      Profile for Omega     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ritten:

Has something happened in the real worl that has shaken your belief system???

No, I just got ticked off with people making statements that they did not, and apparently CAN not, back up.

------------------
"How do you define fool?"
"I don't attempt it. I wait for demonstrations. They inevitably surpass my imagination."
- CJ Cherryh, Invader


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
PsyLiam
Hungry for you
Member # 73

 - posted      Profile for PsyLiam     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
*Looks up at DT and TSN's comments*

I can see them there. Can anyone else?

------------------
You know, when Comedy Central asked us to do a Thanksgiving episode, the first thought that went through my mind was, "Boy, I'd like to have sex with Jennifer Aniston."
-Trey Parker, co-creator of South Park


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
MC Infinity
Active Member
Member # 531

 - posted      Profile for MC Infinity     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
BlueElectron: I'm glad that you agree with me, but if you go back and kill Hitler you may deprive humanity of a valuable lesson, and we could all be dead from a nuclear shotout between the Soviets and the States. WWII taught us that the stakes are too high and this is why we haven't repeated it. A painfull lesson, but a lesson nonetheless.

------------------
"Well if it's gonna be that kind of a party, I'm putting my dick in the mashed potatoes!"

-Nimrod 16/4/2001



Registered: Mar 2001  |  IP: Logged
DT
Senior Member
Member # 80

 - posted      Profile for DT     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thank you Liam, because apparently Omega did not see them. He was here, we have proof of that, but he did not. I suppose he will just say they are so ridiculous they are beneath his commenting on, which is a nice way of his to avoid actually talking about those issues.

------------------
"A mass of tears have been transformed to stones now, sharpened on suffering and woven into slings"
Zack de la Rocha
Rage Against the Machine


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Omega
Some other beginning's end
Member # 91

 - posted      Profile for Omega     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm ignoring them because they're irrelevant to the topic. I asked how the Bible contradicted ITSELF, not your vaunted incomplete archeological records or what have you. You want to start another thread, please do. I did.

------------------
"How do you define fool?"
"I don't attempt it. I wait for demonstrations. They inevitably surpass my imagination."
- CJ Cherryh, Invader

[This message has been edited by Omega (edited April 29, 2001).]


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Diane
aka Tora Ziyal
Member # 53

 - posted      Profile for Diane     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ooh, fun.

Let's start with the beginning: There are two version of the creation of humans. One in which Adam and Eve were created together and equally, the other in which Eve came from Adam's rib.

Oh, and I don't think God created bacteria or viruses. Where did those come from?

Here are some cool stuff I inferred from Anthropology class.

1.The Bible says that man and woman are supposed to be monogamous, but there is no biological evidence to support it. Naturally monogamous animals, such as some species of birds, do not have sexual dimorphism. That is, the male and female of those species have the same body size. This is not the case in sexually promiscuous species because of male competition and females choosing which males they like better (sexual selection), and so males that are bigger, has a longer tail, brighter feathers, etc, get selected over time. Gorillas are 50% dimorphic (females are 50% smaller than males), gibbons are 0%, chimpanzees, bonobos, and humans are 15% dimorphic.

2.Not only that, although chimp males are fiercely protective of their females, 10% of newborns in one community were sired by outside sources. Studies have also found that 10% of newborns in vastly different human cultures were not sired by the husband.

3. There are two body types for hominids so far: robust and gracile. Robust simply means thicker bones, very thick jaws, and a heavy-set body. Gracile are what humans are. Assuming Adam and Eve were gracile, humans cannot have robust characteristics. Yet it exists. There's something called a saggital crest, a bone formation which runs lengthwise down the skull in some robust species for the attachment of jaw muscles. My T.A. in the Anthro class had a very tall friend who has a small saggital crest. She says it is pretty obvious if you feel his head (she did), and this guy got a scholarship for having it. There was also another guy in my class who says he had a saggital crest.

4. Europeans and people from the rest of the world have differences in the skull. It is possible (and quite obvious if you read the above) that Neaderthals, who lived mostly in Europe, interbred with anatomically modern humans, since there was a long period when they existed together (ending at the appearance of art), although there is still no confirming fossil evidence for it.

------------------
"There comes a time when the mind takes on a higher plane of knowledge but can never prove how it got there. All great discoveries have involved such a leap."
--Albert Einstein, on intuition.


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Omega
Some other beginning's end
Member # 91

 - posted      Profile for Omega     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There are two version of the creation of humans. One in which Adam and Eve were created together and equally, the other in which Eve came from Adam's rib.

No, there aren't. Chapter one of Genesis goes into no detail whatsoever on the creation of Adam and Eve. It simply says that they were created on the sixth day. Chapter two goes into the details. There can be no contradiction where there is no overlaping information.

As for the rest, pure opinion, having nothing to do with the Bible and any possible internal contradictions.

------------------
"How do you define fool?"
"I don't attempt it. I wait for demonstrations. They inevitably surpass my imagination."
- CJ Cherryh, Invader


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Diane
aka Tora Ziyal
Member # 53

 - posted      Profile for Diane     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's another one.

The premise of the Fall is that good can only be discerned with the knowledge of evil, hence the tree.
So it follows that obedience to God is good (then disobedience is bad);
and the punishment of disobedience is death;
and death is bad;
but Adam and Eve don't know death or evil;
so how can they understand WHY they shouldn't disobey God?

Imagine for a second that you don't know what evil means. God tells you, "don't eat from this tree or you will xyz." (xyz=death) So, since you only know good, how would you know disobedience wouldn't result in good?

------------------
"There comes a time when the mind takes on a higher plane of knowledge but can never prove how it got there. All great discoveries have involved such a leap."
--Albert Einstein, on intuition.


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
PsyLiam
Hungry for you
Member # 73

 - posted      Profile for PsyLiam     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry, it must be my special non-constitution eyes, but DT's post, dated April 29, 2001 12:57 AM, has a whole heap of internal contradictions. Click up. Go on. A bit further. They are there. Honest. Everyone else can see them quite clearly.

------------------
You know, when Comedy Central asked us to do a Thanksgiving episode, the first thought that went through my mind was, "Boy, I'd like to have sex with Jennifer Aniston."
-Trey Parker, co-creator of South Park


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
DT
Senior Member
Member # 80

 - posted      Profile for DT     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Again, thank you Liam. My second post is more or less reasons why the Bible cannot be taken seriously as anything more than a book. But I agree, it is not internal contradictions, it is just other stuff Omega would have a problem refuting.
The exception is the census issue. This discrepancy in numbers (between those given and the sums) is solvable in one of two ways:

1) This is a flaw in the original writing. Thus, if the Bible can be wrong, it clearly is not inspired by god, for he is perfect.

2) This is a flaw in the copying from the original. Thus, if there can be one flaw, the entire Bible loses its credibility because there can be others.

3) The writers were idiots. Since the Bible is god's word, that means god is an idiot.

My first post, however, which Omega deemed irrelevant, is irrelevant for one reason: it shatters his faith. He asked for internal contradictions because his mommy and his daddy and his preacher taught him the Bible is perfect. I provided him those internal contradictions found through centuries of higher criticism by enlightened scholars. He cannot refute them. If he ignores them, he can maintain his faith in the Bible, faith in god, and thus his entire view of the world. If he acknowledges them, he must try to refute them, will either look EXTREMELY stupid (nothing new there) or have to accept that the Bible is a book. A very good book, but a book. Thus, he'll have to change his entire world view at 15 (which I did, but I'm strong). He will have to either lose his faith in Christianity or become an Enlightened Christian (a contradiction in terms, I'm sure) which means he'll have to accept basic scientific facts and base his belief around logic. It's possible, I assure you, but for someone as devout and yet unintelligent as Omega, it will be a difficult road to hoe. I pity him, I do, but, he asked for it.

Omega, if you feel you are in time of need, just call upon the name of the lord and he shall save you! Or shall he....?

------------------
"A mass of tears have been transformed to stones now, sharpened on suffering and woven into slings"
Zack de la Rocha
Rage Against the Machine


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 13 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  11  12  13   

Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3