Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » My Expanded Shiplist (Page 3)

  This topic comprises 8 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8   
Author Topic: My Expanded Shiplist
Identity Crisis
Defender of the Non-Canon
Member # 67

 - posted      Profile for Identity Crisis     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by AndrewR:
Did Gene ever comment on the FASA stuff?

Gene Rodenberry? Not to my knowledge. His 'rules' of starship design were invented to invalidate the Technical Manual ships, but coincidentally invalidated a number of FASA designs as well.

quote:
And is there a side view of that Ptolemy Class - from the top it looks like a TOS Miranda!!
http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/cargoxporttug_ptolemy.jpg

The similarity has been spotted before. Some people have written stuff about how the Miranda was designed to act as an escort for Ptolemy class vessels and the visual similarity was to confuse attackers - but that ignores the fact that when the Ptolemy is attached to its crago pod(s) it looks nothing like a Miranda.

--------------------
"My theories appal you, my heresies outrage you, I never answer letters and you don't like my tie." - The Doctor

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Spike
Pathetic Vampire
Member # 322

 - posted      Profile for Spike     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
AND just something else - at your site Spike, under the official missing list that was on DS9 and in the DS9 Companion - how come there is a 'Nemesis' listing there - the reUSE it for Nemesis!?! I mean... guh!
[Big Grin] No, this Nemesis has nothing to do with the movie. It's the nickname of the person who sent me this list.

--------------------
"Never give up. And never, under any circumstances, no matter what - never face the facts." - Ruth Gordon

Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks for the replies, guys! [Smile]

--------------------
"Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)

I'm LIZZING! - Liz Lemon (30 Rock)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
The Red Admiral
Admiral on Deck....
Member # 602

 - posted      Profile for The Red Admiral     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
o2
quote:
So, is the Hermes visible on the screen?
The computer display of the Saladin and Ptolemy from TWOK:

http://www.trekmania.net/the_fleet/utopia/others/Saladin_Ptol_WoK.jpg

--------------------
"To the Enterprise and the Stargazer. Old girlfriends we'll never meet again." - Scotty

Trekmania -My Comprehensive Trek Resource

The ASDB

Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You forgot the parts about the criminals and the flogging. Sheesh. What kind of history leaves out the flogging?
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
The Mighty Monkey of Mim
SUPPOSED TO HAVE ICE POWERS!!
Member # 646

 - posted      Profile for The Mighty Monkey of Mim     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Wow, you guys are on top of stuff. [Smile]

I knew that between all of us we could compensate for my deficiencies in history, geography, spelling!

I'll try to get stuff updated this afternoon, after I get home. Thanks for all the scrutiny.

-MMoM [Big Grin]

P.S.
Yes, the Hermes is visible in TWOK. You can tell that it's distinct from the Saladin because of the arrows drawn to the dorsal saucer phaser banks. (Which the Saladin doesn't have.)

--------------------
The flaws we find most objectionable in others are often those we recognize in ourselves.

Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim:
P.S.
Yes, the Hermes is visible in TWOK. You can tell that it's distinct from the Saladin because of the arrows drawn to the dorsal saucer phaser banks. (Which the Saladin doesn't have.)

Did you find yourself experiencing sexual excitement when you realized that?
Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Identity Crisis
Defender of the Non-Canon
Member # 67

 - posted      Profile for Identity Crisis     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim:
Yes, the Hermes is visible in TWOK. You can tell that it's distinct from the Saladin because of the arrows drawn to the dorsal saucer phaser banks. (Which the Saladin doesn't have.)

The Saladin does have dorsal phaser banks and they are labelled in the Technical Manual.

The Hermes does not have dorsal phaser banks and so does not have any label for them in the Technical Manual.

So did you mean to say that the Hermes is shown in TWOK because the arrow is not visible?

--------------------
"My theories appal you, my heresies outrage you, I never answer letters and you don't like my tie." - The Doctor

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
The Mighty Monkey of Mim
SUPPOSED TO HAVE ICE POWERS!!
Member # 646

 - posted      Profile for The Mighty Monkey of Mim     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Identity Crisis:
quote:
Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim:
Yes, the Hermes is visible in TWOK. You can tell that it's distinct from the Saladin because of the arrows drawn to the dorsal saucer phaser banks. (Which the Saladin doesn't have.)

The Saladin does have dorsal phaser banks and they are labelled in the Technical Manual.

The Hermes does not have dorsal phaser banks and so does not have any label for them in the Technical Manual.

So did you mean to say that the Hermes is shown in TWOK because the arrow is not visible?

Whoops! [Roll Eyes]

Yes, that's what I meant. I just flip-flopped the names...

-MMoM [Big Grin]

Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Harry
Stormwind City Guard
Member # 265

 - posted      Profile for Harry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Mmmmmmmm.. dorsal phaser banks
Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
The Mighty Monkey of Mim
SUPPOSED TO HAVE ICE POWERS!!
Member # 646

 - posted      Profile for The Mighty Monkey of Mim     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Okay, this is a long post, so bear with me and look for your segment:

quote:
Originally posted by Starship Millennium:
…the Bozeman screencap as well as the studio model pics of the Firebrand and Princeton look amazingly like the ones I made. Not that I'm keeping track or anything. And under the Trinculo entry, the episode "Sacrifice of Angels" is called "Sacrifice of Angles." And I don't totally agree with including the retouched images of the Constitutions from the Encyclopedia, but to each his own, I guess.

Sorry about the Bozeman credit. Before I replaced it with your DVD cap, I had one there from the Neutral Zone, so that’s why the NZ credit was still there. The Firebrand and Princeton pic I got from Ex-Astris-Scientia. (Perhaps you did make it, I don’t know, but I generally credit the site I took it from.) And thanks for spelling error notice. Done and done. As to the Connie pics, I know they’re a little iffy, but that’s why I specifically state the source and the circumstances under which they were created in the entries.

quote:
Originally posted by AndrewR:
So you are going with the '5xxxx' registry for the Prometheus?

Wasn't it corrected by Okuda somewhere?

If that is corrected - I wasn the Budapest, Appalacia and the Yeager corrected too. They are ALL 7xxxx's not 5's 6's and 8's.

If they are old ships that have been refit that extensively - why haven't we seen other 4's 5's and 6's upgraded like that!?!

Maybe the Sovereign is really and upgraded Excelsior!?! Not.

The (re)appearance of double-secondary hulls. Forward shuttlebays, not to mention many Defiant, Galaxy, Intrepid and Sovereign-esque features makes me think these are newer ships - post Galaxy.

Firstly, I am indeed going with NX-59650 for the Prometheus, as I always have. My reasons for this are essentially stated in the entry’s notes. I find it rather too difficult to ignore the highly-visible number, (Brattain issue aside) especially since every single official publication uses it. Even the Encyclopedia, written by Okuda and which displays the MSD and dedication plaque on which the NX-74913 number, lists the lower number in the main text. I know there will be many who disagree with this, but that’s how I’m leaving it---with the 59650 number in the main entry text and notes about the other, perhaps more “reasonable” number in the annotations.

Secondly, I understand your point about the First Contact vessels. I too have always maintained that they were most likely new vessel designs at the time of the movie. I have no intention of ret-conning their registries, though. I prefer to simply chalk it up to another unexplained “glitch” in the sequential/chronological registry scheme.

quote:
"NAR-25820
Sydney
Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country"

What was this!?! The orbital shuttle!?! I don't believe that this was a Sydney class. The Sydney class is quite large.



Yes, I shall be amending that when I get to that point in the Federation list.

quote:
Nash could be named after John Nash who was depicted in "A Beautiful Mind".


It could be, but I think the idea that it was named for the motion-control/VFX guy is more likely, considering that the ship was never really supposed to be seen closely and was more of an in-joke.

quote:
Canberra and 'old Parliament House' was opened in 1921 (I think)... from 1901 Parliament wasn't held in Sydney as most would think (As it is the largest city) but in Melbourne.

Canberra means 'meeting place' or something like that in that area's local Aboriginal language.

Canberra is a planned city there was a competition and it was one by Walter Burley Griffin.

Sydney was the first founded city (and first permanent white settlement - but some think that Cooktown in Far North Queensland might be - as that is where he, his crew and the Endeavour landed and stayed for several weeks->months repairing their ship which had been breached? by the coral of the Great Barrier Reef. He took the time to navigate out of the coral reefs.

The second White settlement after Sydney was Hobart in southern Tasmania which was called Van Dieman's land then (It is the captial of Tasmania). George Town (or mainly) Launceston in Northern Tasmania was the third White settlement. Launceston actually had a sewer system before such cities as Paris!! (I was walking around Launceston once and walked down an old cobblestone alleyway that had a lot of interesting information).

I think the order then was

Melbourne (now Capital of Victoria)
Brisbane (Named after New South Wales Governer Thomas Brisbane (now Captial of Queensland)
Adelaide (Named After Queen Adelaide)
(now Capital of South Australia and the first ((I think) free settlement town)
Perth (now Capital of Western Australia)
Darwin (Named after Charles Darwin - the S.S. Beagle stopped here) (Captial of the Northern Territory
and Canberra capital of the A.C.T. and Australia and it's territories.

Australia was back before it was discovered "Terra Australis" (Unknown Southern Land) Explorers thought that there out to be a large continent in the Southern hemisphere to match the large continent of Eurasia in the Northern Hemisphere!)

Then named New Holland by Dutch Explorers that skirted and charted parts of the west coast, the southern tips of WA and Tasmania and the west coast of Cape York Pennisula. Most were blown off course trying to reach the Dutch East Indies (Indonesia) or the Spice Islands. They found the coasts and assumed the land, barren and inhospitable.

Then in 1770 by way of New Zealand, Captain James T. Cook discovered the Eastern Coast of Australia and Charted it, landed and claimed it in the name of the British Empire.

At this time it was called New South Wales (all of it) Except Tasmania which was called Van Deiman's land.

Then the eastern part was all New South Wales (except Tas) the middle South Australia and the West, Western Australia.

Then gradually States were formed

Tasmania, Victoria, Queensland and New South Wales.

The Northern Territory was then formed from the northern half of South Australia and in the early twentieth century the Australian Captial Territory was formed.

Australia has the largest area of ocean under it's administration. Australia has the largest area of Antarctica under it's administration.

Some of it's territories include Heard Is. MacQuarrie Island (both uninhabited except for birds/penguins and elephant seas - oh and a few research scientists). Also under it's administration is Lord Howe Island. Norfolk Island (to an extent) (of the Mutiny on the Bounty fame). The Cocos (Keeling Islands) and Christmas Island.

It is the only continent to have one country.
It is the second largest island (the largest being Greenland)
It has the largest sand island (Fraser Island)
It unfortunately has the greatest extinction rate of Fauna (and Flora?)
It is the driest continent (yet moronic arsonist and pyromaniacs continue to light bushfires that destroy homes and kill people).
It is very large and it's like 1500km between Brisbane and Sydney.
It has some of the oldest living extant animals (like the Lung Fish)



AHHH!!!!!!!!! TOO MUCH INFORMATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SENSORY OVERLOAD!!!!!!!!!!!!

No, seriously. Thanks for the info. Sorry about getting your capital wrong. No offense. [Wink]

quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Phlox:
And in the entry for the Danube class U.S.S. Shenandoah it says the ship was "attacked by the Jem’Hadar and destroyed." Well, we don't really know if it was destroyed, it might've just been abandoned, they sorta forgot about it after Jake and Nog were beamed to the Valiant. Since the rest of your list is strictly canon, it might be a good idea to mention that no one said what happened to the ship in the episode, but you presume it was destroyed.

Thank you. Done.

quote:
Originally posted by Dat:
It's more likely that the Odyssey was (more) named after one of Homer's epics than the command module of Apollo 13.

Well, the Encyclopedia does say it was for the spacecraft…but I guess that’s just Okuda’s presumption. I think I’ll leave it for now.

quote:
Originally posted by Masao:
A few nits/comments:
1. Princeton is in New Jersey, not Pennsylvania!
2. You should mention the Russian battleship Potemkin rather than or inaddition to the General. Probably better known because of the movie.
3. For Sequoia, I'd mention the guy who developed the Cherokee script, for whom the treee was named.
4. Spector might be named for Phil Spector, the famous record producer.
5. In War of the Worlds, "Thunder Child" is two words.
6. Re: Lollipop http://www.reelclassics.com/Actresses/Shirley/goodship-lyrics.htm

1. D’oh! [Roll Eyes]
2. (along with number one) Done.
3. Wow, I had no knowledge of this man. Thanks a lot! Done.
4. I like Pym’s idea better… [Razz]
5. I think the record has shown that the accepted spelling for the Trek ship (though it was definitely supposed to be a reference to Wells’ work) is Thunderchild.
6. OMG! I saw this film as a little kid and totally forgot! Done.

quote:
Originally posted by Solommagnus de Pym:
Spector could be in reference to Gaming Guru Warren Spector. Given the source of the name, perhaps it most likely is.

I agree. Do you know if Spector’s credits include any Trek games?


Thanks for the input, everyone.
-MMoM [Big Grin]

--------------------
The flaws we find most objectionable in others are often those we recognize in ourselves.

Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Of course not. He is talent!
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Masao
doesn't like you either
Member # 232

 - posted      Profile for Masao     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Potemkin: I think you should mention the movie, Battleship Potemkin, which is probably better known than either the General (or Potemkin villages) or the battleship itself. http://us.imdb.com/Title?0015648
"Thunder Child": Although the single-word version of the name is accepted in Star Trek and should, therefore, appear in your list as such, it is a misspelling of Well's ship's name. Just interesting background.

--------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum

Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
The Mighty Monkey of Mim
SUPPOSED TO HAVE ICE POWERS!!
Member # 646

 - posted      Profile for The Mighty Monkey of Mim     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I will add a note about the Thunderchild's spelling, but I think mentioning the 1925 Potemkin film is just slightly excessive for the purposes of this list.

Done.

-MMoM [Big Grin]

--------------------
The flaws we find most objectionable in others are often those we recognize in ourselves.

Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Masao
doesn't like you either
Member # 232

 - posted      Profile for Masao     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Re: Columbia being named for the Space Shuttle. If FJ's tech manual came out in 1975 (or so), that's too early for shuttle names, I think. This KSC page tells about the history of the name and the shuttle. http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/resources/orbiters/columbia.html

--------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum

Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 8 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3