posted
I think I have a problem with expressing my spirituality somewhat...(yes, I AM spiritual) Basically I believe that the universe is conciouc and that we are all made of star-stuff and that we and other living things are the universe made manifest, in order to try to understand itself.
I do happen to believe in reincarnation, that we are souls with bodies on a...journey of seeking, of understanding. I'm not really making sense am I? But what i've tried to explain is pretty much how I percieve things to be.
------------------ In this crazy world of lemons, baby...you're lemonade!
posted
Well, thank you all. Much more positive responses than I had hoped for. Varied posts, none of which having to do with death threats. I can take that. Infinity, by all means, eat something.
P.S. Quatre Winner, do you know how WEIRD it is responding to someone with the name of a Gundam Wing character? I keep forming a mental image of a short, compassionate, Arabian blond with a high-pitched voice. Very strange.
P.P.S. Again to Quatre Winner. You ARE making sense. At least to me. Thank you for enlightening us with your views.
[This message has been edited by Daniel (edited March 18, 2001).]
posted
Dan said: P.S. Quatre Winner, do you know how WEIRD it is responding to someone with the name of a Gundam Wing character? I keep forming a mental image of a short, compassionate, Arabian blond with a high-pitched voice. Very strange.
*L* Wanna know something? I AM short, thin and very blond. My boyfriend says i'm compassionate but sometimes i'm not so sure. And my voice isn't all that high. it's not all that deep either.
Dan also said: P.P.S. Again to Quatre Winner. You ARE making sense. At least to me. Thank you for enlightening us with your views.
Thanks!
------------------ In this crazy world of lemons, baby...you're lemonade!
posted
I've been gone 4 days, and look what happens...
Revelations is silly.
It occurred to me, that saying that what is written in Revelations MUST happen is in direct conflict with the concept of "free will" used by so many religious types to try and justify why people suffer for what is seemingly, to rational people, 'no good reason.'
That aside, one would accept that the Antichrist will have a thorough understanding of scripture (otherwise how would he know what prophecies to fulfil?) Therefore he will most likely be a religious leader rather than a temporal one. Pat Robertson comes to mind.
Now, we know that the AC is supposed to be a man... The "Omen" movies notwithstanding. Therefore, he must have Free Will. Now... if the AC REALLY wanted to twist God's panties in a bunch... he'd be best off not doing ANYTHING that was in Revelations. It'd be too obvious.
Really, religious experts have been predicting the imminent Apocalypse in signs of the times as far back as when it was first written. Heck, when Christ was ACTIVE there were several groups of Apocalyptic Jews, who believed that the end of the world was near. Some scholars even hypothesize that Jesus was one... which would explain, a lot more easily than twisting it into 'metaphor,' why JC told some of his followers that they would "not taste of death before the kingdom of God shall arrive."
------------------ The government that seems the most unwise, oft goodness to the people best supplies. That which is meddling, touching everything, will work but ill, and disappointment bring. - The Tao Te Ching
posted
I'm not going to argue your opinion of Revelation, Rob. Just your interpretation of it.
It occurred to me, that saying that what is written in Revelations MUST happen is in direct conflict with the concept of "free will"
Hey, now, predicting what's going to happen isn't the same thing as causing it to happen. We're not talking about self-fulfiling prophecy. We're talking about LEGITIMATE prophecy, which is a whole other deal.
And before you try to argue about it being legitimate, remember, I'm arguing against your interpretation, not your views.
That said, your next point is also negated.
if the AC REALLY wanted to twist God's panties in a bunch... he'd be best off not doing ANYTHING that was in Revelations.
Only assuming his main objective is to prove God wrong, as opposed to deceiving as many souls as possible.
------------------ "Omega is right." -Jeff Karrde, March 18, 2001 08:47 PM
posted
Expecially when we design our foreing policy to make it happen.
What's this? God didn't expect to think that all of us to think out of the box, did he? If somebody is gonna layeth the smackdown on MY planet, I damn well wanna now WHY!
So, to quote the humans, up YOURS!
------------------ In this crazy world of lemons, baby...you're lemonade!
posted
"Hey, now, predicting what's going to happen isn't the same thing as causing it to happen."
It is when you're GOD, and you DO cause it to happen.
See, when you're GOD, an omnipotent, omniscient being in CHARGE of running the Universe, the words 'cause' and 'allow' are semanticaly identical.
"Only assuming his main objective is to prove God wrong, as opposed to deceiving as many souls as possible."
Same difference. Of course, nobody YET has explained to my satisfaction just what it is Lucifer/Satan/Sammael wants with human souls. Are they, like, fuel for the war effort? Soldiers? Bricks in the Wall?
What does God need with a starship? What does Lucifer need with souls? They won't give him what he wants, rule over Heaven, so what's the deal?
------------------ The government that seems the most unwise, oft goodness to the people best supplies. That which is meddling, touching everything, will work but ill, and disappointment bring. - The Tao Te Ching
[This message has been edited by First of Two (edited March 21, 2001).]
posted
See, when you're GOD, an omnipotent, omniscient being in CHARGE of running the Universe, the words 'cause' and 'allow' are semanticaly identical.
Ah, but there's your problem. God DOESN'T run the universe. He COULD, but he chooses not to interfere most of the time. See, God's not a liberal. He doesn't believe in micromanaging every little portion of your life. I suppose you could legitimately say that God is the cause of every event in history, as God is the ultimate Source, but every event that has ever happened has NOT been God's will. There's a difference between setting up a sequence of events that causes something only after being interfered with by others; and actively DOING it.
Of course, nobody YET has explained to my satisfaction just what it is Lucifer/Satan/Sammael wants with human souls.
Simple: he wants to hurt God as much as possible, and that's the way to do it. If you can't hurt Him directly, hurt something He cares about.
------------------ "Omega is right." -Jeff Karrde, March 18, 2001 08:47 PM
quote:God DOESN'T run the universe. He COULD, but he chooses not to interfere most of the time. See, God's not a liberal. He doesn't believe in micromanaging every little portion of your life. I suppose you could legitimately say that God is the cause of every event in history, as God is the ultimate Source, but every event that has ever happened has NOT been God's will.
*chuckles* Please prove this. And quoting some passage of the bible doesn't count.
------------------ "If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kickboxing."
[This message has been edited by Gurgeh (edited April 27, 2001).]