capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709
posted
VP hurt his feelings.
yes, a USS Archer would mean somebody remembered the NX-01. or it would mean somebody remembers somebody named Archer. Doesnt a present day navy have an Archer-class already?
-------------------- "Are you worried that your thoughts are not quite.. clear?"
Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
USS INTREPID NCC-74608 USS VALIANT NCC-75418 USS GALAXY NCC-70637 USS AIRES NCC-45167 USS NOVA NCC-73515 (2nd digit is most definatly a 3) USS HOOD NCC-42296 USS ARCHER NCC-44278
I'm not convinced the Nova is indeed the Nova, since not only is the registry a fuck up, but I believe the 2nd letter is not an O. It may be a C?
You guys might want to look at the bigger picture, it might help you read it better
[ October 16, 2002, 03:10: Message edited by: The359 ]
-------------------- "Lotta people go through life doing things badly. Racing's important to men who do it well. When you're racing, it's life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting."
-Steve McQueen as Michael Delaney, LeMans
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Forbidden You don't have permission to access /treknews/gallery-treknews/gallery/Star_Trek_Filme/Star_Trek_10_-_Nemesis/Bilder/188.jpg on this server
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
USS INTREPID NCC-74600 USS VALIANT NCC-75418 USS GALAXY NCC-70637 USS AIRES NCC-45167 (A typo ) USS NOVA NCC-73?515 (second 3 could be an 8, but that wouldn't fit the Equinox and Rhode Island.. OTOH, the N could be a B or even a Q) USS HOOD NCC-42296 USS ARCHER NCC-44276 (the last digit looks a lot like the last digit from the HOOD)
The weirdest thing, though, is the anachronistic "STAR FLEET". The last time we saw it, IIRC, was here (for historic reasons, since the building itself has STARFLEET). However, in Enterprise, we see this
OOPS.. it seems like we have an "it changed, then changed back again, then changed back AGAIN" situation.
Alternatively, it could be that Star?Fleet itself doesn't know how to spell it's name .
posted
Maybe there is Starfleet and Star Fleet. One the Earth's Star Fleet and the other the Federation Starfleet?
What I find a bit wierd is seeing Archer talking to Picard and Data.
Wierd - just cause and wierd cause look at Data's get-up... it looks like that Valure SP? track-suit that George Costanza wore in that Seinfeld episode where Jerry has his house sprayed for Fleas.
Andrew
-------------------- "Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)
posted
The Nova-thing apparently has a background star marring the first letter, making interpretation all the more fun. May I suggest USS Goya?
The Remans are even more different from Romulans than I originally thought. Too bad. Their guns look really weird, with Klingon-style exposed barrels but Romulan-style oversized trigger guards. The rifle is especially awkward, compared with Romulan versions (both the "Die is Cast" and "Unification" ones). It reminds me of the long, clumsy Stormtrooper rifle from AotC...
New hairdo for Troi. Still no new do for Riker. Or Picard. Yawn.
posted
Timo, new hairdo for Picard? LOL, that's a classic!
Andrew, that won't be Archer talking to Picard. That's Bakula talking to Stewart, behind the scenes I suppose. Perhaps Scott Bakula is like us: he can't wait to see Nemesis for real...
Registered: Nov 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
As I look at the bigger picture, I'm not all sure about "Aires". In fact, the "R" looks alot like the "S" at the end, which would make it "Aises". But I'm also not sure that it's an A at the beginning.
After a little photoshop playing, I get various results that now leave me wondering whether it's an "R" an "S" or an "N"
Some of these numbers and nearly that entire second to last ship are impossible to make out.
I made this pic about an hour ago and said to myself! I GOTTA POST THIS ON FLARE. I come here and BOOM a 4 page thread already on it. Meh, at least this one is higher res.
[ October 16, 2002, 23:51: Message edited by: Proteus ]
Registered: Aug 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Oh, about Star Fleet vs Starfleet. I guess Star Fleet is more buisness/professional (physical signs, presentations) and Starfleet is more of a logo type.
Registered: Aug 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
I agree with timo's suggestion actually- that Nova looks more like Goya to me. The first letter letter looks not much like a N and the third letter looks too thin at the base and bottom third to be a V.
-------------------- "Marge, trying is the first step towards failure!!" Homer
Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
posted
Although I can see the ships' names better, and that the Archer's first digit is definitely a 4, everything else is hardly conclusive. Just look at every time an "NCC" is listed. Each of the first "N's" look different every time. Here' my take:
Intrepid NCC-74600 Valiant NCC-75410 Galaxy NCC-70637 Aires NCC-45167 (presumably a typo for Aries) Nova NCC-73515 (so much for chronological registries...) Hood NCC-42296 Archer NCC-44270
-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
)![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic